Digital Twins: Complete Guide to Transforming Enterprise Operations

When Singapore's Changi Airport created a digital twin of its entire operations in 2020, the virtual replica ingested data from more than 1,000 sensors to optimize everything from passenger flow to baggage handling. The result was a measurable reduction in delays of nearly 30 percent, even as the airport managed record passenger volumes. For enterprise leaders, this story illustrates the promise of digital twins at scale. It also highlights an uncomfortable reality: for every successful digital twin, many initiatives fail to move beyond pilots or dashboards that never deliver sustained business value.

Interest in digital twin technology is accelerating rapidly. The digital twin market is expected to grow from USD 24.8 billion in 2025 to USD 259.3 billion by 2032, reflecting roughly 60 percent annual growth. However, nearly half of organizations cite data quality and data integration challenges as the single biggest barrier to success. The gap is clear. Most enterprises focus on the digital twin itself—models, simulations and visualization—while underestimating the data foundation required to support it.

So, what is a digital twin in an enterprise context? A digital twin is a virtual representation of a physical asset, system, or process that uses real-time data to mirror its behavior, performance and condition across its lifecycle. The concept of digital twins originated from NASA's efforts to improve the physical-model simulation of spacecraft.

Unlike static simulations, digital twin technology relies on continuous, bidirectional data flows—ingesting live operational data while feeding insights and optimization signals back into physical systems in the real world.

This guide explains how digital twins work, outlines practical digital twin use cases across industries and clarifies why digital twin technology success depends less on visualization tools and more on enterprise-grade data integration, master data management and data governance. Whether you are a CIO evaluating digital twin initiatives, a CDO assessing data readiness, or an operations leader exploring optimization opportunities, this article provides the strategic context needed to make informed, scalable decisions.

Understanding Digital Twins: Definition and Core Concepts

The Digital Twin Explained

At its core, a digital twin is a virtual representation of a physical asset, system, or process that mirrors real-world behavior using continuous, real-time data from IoT sensors and operational systems.

Unlike traditional models that are built once and reviewed periodically, digital twins are dynamic by design. They remain persistently connected to their physical counterparts through ongoing data exchange, allowing enterprises to observe, analyze, and optimize operations as conditions change.

The Three Defining Characteristics of a True Digital Twin

The characteristics that distinguish a true digital twin from related technologies are:

Real-time synchronization

A digital twin is not a snapshot in time; it continuously reflects the current state of the physical entity by ingesting live operational data from multiple sources.

Bidirectional data flow

Digital twins do not only receive data—they generate insights, predictions and recommendations that flow back into operational systems to influence real-world performance.

Lifecycle persistence

A digital twin exists across the full asset lifecycle, from design and commissioning through operations and eventual decommissioning, accumulating historical context that improves decision-making over time.

The Four Levels of Digital Twins

Enterprise implementations typically evolve across four levels of digital twins.

1. Component or part twins

Component or part twins represent individual elements, such as a valve in an aircraft engine or a motor in a wind turbine.

2. Asset twins

Asset twins model complete functional units with interacting components—typically consisting of two or more components—such as an entire engine or production machine.

3. System twins

System twins connect multiple assets into integrated environments, such as a power generation facility or logistics hub.

4. Process twins

At the highest level, process twins model end-to-end workflows and manufacturing processes, including supply chains, production operations, and airport logistics.

Each level introduces exponentially greater data complexity. More sources, tighter synchronization requirements and more intricate data relationships must be managed reliably. This is where enterprise data platforms, such as Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), become critical, providing the scalable data integration, orchestration and trust needed to support digital twins beyond isolated pilots.

Digital Twin vs. Simulation vs. 3D Model

Digital twins are often confused with simulations or 3D models, but the differences are material, especially for enterprise leaders evaluating value and risk.

Simulations

Simulations run predefined scenarios based on assumed inputs. They are useful for testing hypotheses, but they are disconnected from real-world operations and do not evolve automatically with real-world conditions.

3D models

3D models provide visual representations of assets or environments at a specific point in time. While they are foundational for visualization and design, they lack operational awareness.

Digital twins

Digital twins, by contrast, are living systems. They combine virtual models with real-time data integration, enabling continuous monitoring, prediction and optimization. This distinction is central to the digital twin vs simulation discussion: simulations answer "what if," while digital twins answer "what is happening now and what should happen next." For enterprises pursuing operational efficiency and digital transformation, that difference determines whether insights remain theoretical or drive measurable outcomes.

Comparison Table: Digital Twin vs. Simulation vs. 3D Model

Key Components of Digital Twin Systems

• Physical Assets: Equipment, infrastructure, or processes being monitored and optimized

• IoT Sensors & Data Sources: Temperature, pressure, vibration, location and performance metrics

• Data Integration Layer: Real-time ingestion, transformation and synchronization across systems (a core Informatica strength)

• Analytics & AI Engine: Predictive maintenance, anomaly detection and pattern analysis

• Virtual Model: Mathematical and logical representation responding to changing conditions

• Visualization Interface: Dashboards, 3D views and alerts for human decision-making

• Feedback Mechanisms: Control signals and optimization recommendations sent back to physical systems

The Role of Data Integration in Digital Twin Success

The data integration layer is frequently underestimated, yet it determines whether a digital twin can operate at enterprise scale. It must ingest data from diverse sources and formats, enforce data quality and consistency, apply security and governance controls and synchronize information in near real time. Without a unified, enterprise-grade data integration foundation, even the most sophisticated digital twin models struggle to deliver reliable, actionable insights.

How Digital Twins Work: The Data-Driven Process

Digital twins are often described in terms of models and simulations, but in practice they are data-driven systems. Their effectiveness depends on how reliably data is collected, integrated, governed and transformed into insight. Understanding how digital twins work requires examining this end-to-end data flow—and the enterprise data management capabilities that sustain it at scale.

Step 1: Data Collection and Sensor Deployment

Every digital twin begins with data collection from the physical world. IoT sensors capture operational signals such as temperature, pressure, vibration, GPS location, energy consumption and equipment status. Increasingly, assets arrive as smart objects, with built-in sensing and connectivity embedded by manufacturers.

Beyond sensors, enterprise digital twins rely heavily on system data. ERP systems contribute asset, financial and maintenance records. MES and SCADA systems provide execution and control data. PLM platforms add engineering context, while CRM systems supply customer and service insights. Many use cases also depend on external data feeds, such as weather conditions, regulatory thresholds, market demand, or supplier performance.

The scale of this challenge is often underestimated. For instance, a single wind turbine can generate more than 5 GB of data per day from hundreds of sensors. Across a 200-turbine wind farm, that translates into terabytes of real-time data that must be collected, validated and synchronized continuously, often with sub-second latency requirements. This is why digital twin IoT data integration is not a peripheral concern, but a core architectural requirement.

A platform such as Informatica IDMC addresses this complexity, with over 300 pre-built connectors for industrial and enterprise systems, along with automated schema detection and evolution management to handle constantly changing data structures.

Step 2: Real-Time Data Integration and Quality Management

Once data is captured, it must be integrated into a unified, trusted view. Digital twins aggregate structured data from databases, semi-structured data such as logs and events and unstructured data like documents or maintenance notes from multiple sources. This requires continuous data transformation including standardizing formats, aligning timestamps and resolving semantic differences across systems.

Equally critical is data quality management. Anomalies must be detected, missing values addressed and conflicting readings reconciled. Sensor data also needs to be aligned with master data, linking time-series measurements to asset hierarchies, product specifications, locations and organizational structures. Unified asset and product master data through master data management ensure a single source of truth can be created. 

Digital twins are only as accurate as the data feeding them. If data arrives late, quality is poor, or asset records differ across systems, the virtual replica becomes unreliable, leading to flawed insights and costly decisions. 

However, data integration challenges such as IT/OT format incompatibilities, legacy equipment requiring edge integration, synchronization across distributed locations and governance policies that conflict with real-time needs persist, impacting performance.

Informatica supports this layer through warehouse-native SQL ELT, CLAIRE AI–driven data quality monitoring and MDM capabilities that unify asset master data across the enterprise.

Step 3: Virtual Model Creation and Calibration

With trusted data in place, organizations create the virtual models that define a digital twin. These models combine physics-based equations with machine learning algorithms trained on historical data to represent real-world behavior. Calibration is continuous, comparing predicted outcomes with actual performance and adjusting parameters as conditions change.

For example, an aircraft engine digital twin uses thermodynamic equations, stress models and wear algorithms, calibrated against live flight data to achieve over 95 percent accuracy in predicting maintenance needs. Achieving this level of precision depends on clean, complete historical data spanning multiple operating conditions, reinforcing why digital twin implementation success is tightly coupled to data management maturity.

Step 4: Analytics, Simulation and Predictive Insights

Once operational, digital twins generate value through analytics and simulation. Pattern recognition identifies degradation trends and efficiency gaps. Scenario simulations test “what-if” configurations without physical risk. Predictive maintenance models forecast failures before they occur, while optimization algorithms recommend adjustments to balance cost, performance, safety and emissions.

Advanced AI techniques power these capabilities, including anomaly detection, regression models for remaining useful life, optimization algorithms and natural language processing applied to maintenance logs and manuals. Organizations that successfully operationalize digital twin analytics report 20 to 40 percent reductions in unplanned downtime and 10 to 15 percent improvements in operational efficiency, demonstrating the tangible digital twin benefits enabled by a strong data foundation.

Digital Twin Use Cases Across Industries

Digital twins deliver value only when they are grounded in reliable, integrated and governed data. Across industries, successful implementations share a common pattern: strong business outcomes enabled by disciplined data management. The following digital twin examples illustrate how organizations translate virtual replicas into measurable operational impact, and highlight where and how strong data foundations determine digital twin success.

Manufacturing and Production Optimization

In manufacturing, digital twin use cases focus on improving throughput, quality and resilience. 

• Production line efficiency: Production teams use virtual factory floors to test layout changes, identify bottlenecks and optimize capacity before making physical adjustments. 

• Quality control: Quality leaders apply predictive models to detect defect patterns early, reducing scrap and rework. 

• Supply chain resilience: Process twins simulate supply chain disruptions to improve inventory strategies and routing decisions

• Energy optimization: Digital twins monitor, adjust and optimize consumption across facilities in real-time.

A well-known example is Siemens, which built a digital twin of its Amberg Electronics Plant. The virtual factory processes data from over 30,000 control points, enabling production scenarios to be tested before implementation. This approach has contributed to a 99.99885% quality rate and an eightfold increase in productivity over 25 years.

Data Management Foundation

Achieving such results depends on a robust data foundation. For example, industry-specific challenges in manufacturing require tailored data management approaches. Digital twins require the tight integration of MES, ERP, SCADA, and quality management systems, as well as real-time synchronization with production equipment and master data management for product specifications, bills of materials, and equipment catalogs. Long-term historical data must also be retained to support multi-year trend analysis. 

Informatica IDMC scores because it bridges industrial OT systems with enterprise IT platforms, while MDM ensures consistent product and asset data across facilities. For deeper technical guidance on building enterprise data architectures for digital twins, read our digital twin implementation framework guide.

Energy and Utilities Asset Management

Energy and utilities organizations rely on digital twins to manage large, distributed asset networks across energy operations. These capabilities directly support reliability, sustainability and cost control objectives.

• Wind/solar farm optimization: Maximizing renewable energy generation based on weather patterns

• Grid management: Balancing supply/demand, predicting equipment failures, managing distributed assets

• Predictive maintenance: Reducing turbine downtime, extending transformer life, optimizing maintenance schedules

A real world example is that of General Electric, which operates digital twins for more than 60,000 wind turbines worldwide. By combining operational sensor data with predictive analytics, GE increases energy output by 5 to 10 percent while reducing maintenance costs by roughly 20 percent through optimized service schedules.

The data challenges are significant. Assets are geographically dispersed, requiring edge integration and synchronization. Weather data must be incorporated alongside operational readings, while regulatory reporting and compliance data add additional complexity. Integration with smart grid systems and energy markets further increases the need for a unified, governed data platform that can ingest streaming and batch data, apply automated data quality controls, maintain master data consistency across assets and locations and enforce governance without slowing real-time operations. Enterprise platforms like Informatica IDMC are designed to address these challenges and operate at scale.

Healthcare and Medical Device Innovation

In healthcare, digital twins enable innovation while managing risk. 

• Medical device testing: Medical device manufacturers use virtual prototypes to reduce physical testing costs and accelerate regulatory approval. 

• Treatment planning: Providers explore patient-specific twins to simulate treatment responses or surgical outcomes. 

• Hospital operations: Hospitals apply operational twins to improve patient flow, equipment utilization and staffing efficiency. 

• Clinical trials: In research, synthetic patient populations support safer and faster clinical trials.

In practice, Philips uses digital twins to test MRI scanner designs virtually, reducing prototype costs by up to 40 percent while improving image quality. Thousands of configurations can be evaluated digitally, something that would be impossible with physical prototypes alone.

These use cases place heavy demands on data governance. Healthcare twins must comply with HIPAA, support de-identification and anonymization for research, manage patient consent and maintain detailed audit trails. Without strong governance and data quality controls, digital twin initiatives in healthcare face unacceptable regulatory and trust risks.

Addressing these requirements at scale depends on consistent data quality, policy-driven governance and end-to-end data lineage. Enterprise platforms like Informatica IDMC enable organizations to govern sensitive health data across cloud, on-premises and hybrid environments without compromising analytical agility.

Smart Cities and Infrastructure

Smart cities apply digital twins to optimize urban systems. 

• Traffic optimization: Traffic twins enable real-time routing that can reduce congestion by 20 to 30 percent. 

• Building management: Building digital twins improves energy efficiency, HVAC optimization and space utilization. 

• Infrastructure monitoring: Infrastructure twins monitor bridges, water systems and emergency response readiness.

A leading example is Virtual Singapore, which combines 3D city models with live sensor data to simulate infrastructure changes before construction and improve emergency planning. Achieving this requires integration across transportation sensors, utilities, environmental monitoring, public safety systems and citizen service platforms, underscoring, once again, that digital twins succeed only when built on a strong, unified data foundation.

The Data Foundation: Why Digital Twins Fail Without It

Despite significant investment, many digital twin initiatives fail to deliver meaningful ROI. Industry research shows that up to 70% of digital twin projects encounter major challenges, with data quality issues, integration complexity and governance gaps cited as the primary barriers. The common mistake is treating digital twins as a modeling or visualization problem, rather than a data foundation challenge. Understanding these risks is essential before launching any enterprise-scale digital twin implementation.

Data Quality: The Hidden Foundation

High-performing digital twins depend on data that is accurate, complete, consistent and timely. In practice, sensor data often suffers from data quality challenges:

• Sensor data accuracy: Calibration drift, measurement errors, network transmission issues.

• Completeness gaps: Missing data due to connectivity problems or sensor failures.

• Consistency conflicts: Different systems reporting contradictory information about the same asset.

• Timeliness requirements: In fast-moving operations, even slight delays can make data stale and render predictions ineffective.

The potential business impact is significant. In one manufacturing organization, a digital twin repeatedly recommended inefficient production schedules because supplier lead-time data in the ERP system was three to six months outdated. The twin optimized against incorrect constraints, resulting in nearly $2 million annually in excess inventory before the data quality issue was identified.

How to Address Data Quality for Effective Digital Twins

• Automated data quality monitoring with anomaly detection

• Real-time validation rules configured for each data source

• Data quality dashboards showing completeness, accuracy, timeliness metrics

• Automated remediation workflows that resolve issues before they propagate downstream. 

Maintaining data quality at scale requires automated monitoring. Informatica IDMC addresses this through built-in data quality capabilities, including over 100+ pre-configured quality rules, AI-powered anomaly detection via CLAIRE and automated remediation workflows, ensuring digital twins operate on reliable, trusted data. 

Integration Complexity: Connecting the Enterprise

Digital twins must integrate data across highly diverse environments. Enterprise IT systems such as ERP and CRM need to be connected with OT systems like SCADA, MES and PLM. These environments use different protocols (OPC-UA, Modbus, MQTT), data models and latency expectations. At scale, organizations must process millions of sensor events per second across global operations, while also supporting batch integration of historical data for model training. Legacy equipment adds further complexity, often requiring edge processing to bridge systems without native IoT capabilities. 

When integration architectures fail to scale, the cost is high. One energy company spent 18 months building custom integrations for a wind farm digital twin, only to find the solution could not scale beyond 50 turbines. Replatforming to an enterprise integration solution cost $5 million and delayed ROI by two years.

Sub-second latency requirements demand real-time modern integration architectures. This is why scalable, hybrid integration architectures, which enable and combine the four key data integration patterns—edge, streaming and batch processing—are foundational to digital twin success.

Data Integration Patterns Supporting Digital Twin Architectures

Master Data Management: The Single Source of Truth

Digital twins rely on master data to provide business context. Yet challenges and points of failure persist.

MDM Challenges and Failure Points That Break Digital Twins

• Inconsistent asset hierarchies across ERP, maintenance and engineering systems, leading to multiple asset IDs for the same physical equipment

• Conflicting product and BOM data, with specification and version mismatches between design and production, causing digital twins to reference incorrect configurations

• Fragmented supplier master data, making it impossible to link failing assets to the correct spare parts, vendors, or service contracts

• Non-standardized reference data (failure codes, asset types, units of measure), resulting in unreliable cross-site and enterprise-wide analytics

• Out-of-date organizational and ownership data, where changes in responsibility are not reflected in asset records, undermining accountability and governance

For example, without master data management, sensor readings cannot be reliably associated with the correct asset, location, specification, or supplier. When a digital twin references “Pump 247,” it must know which physical pump this represents, where it is located, how it is configured and which supplier provides replacement parts. 

Multidomain MDM architecture capabilities of a unified platform such as Informatica IDMC creates unified, authoritative ‘golden records’ for assets, products, suppliers and locations, ensuring digital twins operate from a single source of truth.

Governance and Security: Protecting Valuable Data

Digital twins generate and consume highly sensitive operational and design data and enterprises must follow stringent security requirements for data movements. Effective governance frameworks must define ownership, quality standards, retention policies and usage controls without slowing innovation.

• Controlled access to sensitive operational data: Requires role-based access controls aligned to organizational responsibilities to ensure only authorized users can view or modify digital twin data

• Trust in data and analytical outcomes: Requires end-to-end data lineage tracking from sensors through analytics to verify data origin, transformations and usage

• Regulatory compliance and audit readiness: Requires comprehensive audit logging and retention of data access, changes and model updates to meet FDA, FAA, ISO and similar requirements

• Protection of intellectual property and operational insights: Requires encryption of data in transit (from sensors to cloud) and at rest to prevent unauthorized access or leakage

• Safe data sharing with partners and regulators: Requires data anonymization and masking to protect sensitive information while enabling collaboration and reporting

Compliance and security requirements demand comprehensive data governance. Informatica’s AXON enterprise data governance capabilities support these needs through unified cataloging, lineage tracking, policy enforcement and auditability across the digital twin data ecosystem. This data foundation is what separates scalable, trusted digital twins from initiatives that stall under complexity. 

Implementing Digital Twins: Strategic Roadmap

Phase 1: Assessment and Pilot Selection (3–6 Months)

Assessment Activities

• Use case identification: Determine which assets or processes offer the highest ROI potential

• Data readiness evaluation: Assess what data exists, its quality and where gaps remain

• Technology stack assessment: Review existing platforms against new digital twin requirements

• Skills inventory: Identify gaps in data engineering, analytics and domain expertise

Pilot Selection Criteria

• Business value: Clear, measurable benefits such as cost reduction, efficiency gains, or risk mitigation

• Data availability: Sufficient historical data for model training, with sensors already deployed or easy to add

• Manageable scope: Limited to a single asset type, production line, or process

• Executive support: Visible sponsorship and a protected budget

Pilot Success Metrics

• Prediction accuracy vs. actual outcomes: Target 90%+ accuracy for critical predictions

• Time-to-insight reduction: Aim for a 50%+ improvement compared to current processes

• ROI potential: Demonstrate a credible path to a 3–5× investment return within two years

• Scalability validation: Prove the architecture can expand beyond the pilot to enterprise scope

The Informatica Advantage

IDMC’s Quick Start templates and pre-built connectors accelerate pilot deployment, while Intelligent automation through CLAIRE AI reduces manual data preparation efforts. This allows teams to focus on use case value rather than infrastructure. 

Phase 2: Data Foundation and Architecture (6–9 Months)

Infrastructure Components

• Cloud platform selection: AWS IoT, Azure Digital Twins, Google Cloud IoT, or hybrid approaches

• Data integration platform: Real-time data streaming, batch processing and API management

• Data storage architecture: Time-series databases, data lakes and operational data stores

• Analytics environment: ML/AI platforms, visualization tools and simulation engines

Data Foundation Priorities

• Master data consolidation: Create unified asset, product and location master data

• Data quality framework: Implement automated monitoring and remediation

• Integration architecture: Connect priority systems using scalable, repeatable patterns

• Governance framework: Establish policies, roles and compliance processes

Timeline Expectations

Building a production-ready data foundation typically requires 6–9 months for enterprise deployments. Organizations that skip this phase and move directly to digital twin software often encounter delays when data quality and integration issues surface.

Critical Path

• Months 1–3: Master data management implementation

• Months 3–6: System integration and data quality framework

• Months 6–9: Governance policies and security controls

The Informatica Advantage

IDMC Cloud Data Integration platform connects 300+ sources and accelerates the process with pre-configured templates for common digital twin architectures. This can reduce implementation time by up to 40–50%.

Phase 3: Production Deployment and Scaling (12–18 Months)

Production Rollout

• Expand asset coverage: Scale from pilot scope to the full asset population

• Integrate additional systems: Connect remaining data sources for a comprehensive view

• Operationalize insights: Embed digital twin outputs into business processes and decision workflows

• Build organizational capability: Train users, establish support models and document best practices

Scaling Challenges

• Performance: Maintain sub-second latency as data volumes increase by 10–100×

• Cost: Manage cloud compute and storage expenses as asset coverage expands

• Change management: Drive user adoption, process change and cultural alignment

• Continuous improvement: Refine models, add new use cases and incorporate technology updates

Success Indicators

• Documented ROI achievement through cost savings, efficiency gains, or risk reduction

• User adoption rates above 80% for target roles

• System uptime exceeding 99.5% for mission-critical operations

• A clearly identified pipeline of additional use cases

Best practice

Deploy a scaling strategy that starts with the highest-value assets using the 80/20 rule, then expands systematically based on demonstrated ROI. Most enterprises reach enterprise-wide deployment within 24–36 months of the initial pilot.

Measuring Success: ROI and Performance Metrics

Financial Metrics and ROI Framework

Direct Cost Savings

• Maintenance cost reduction: 20–40% reduction in unplanned maintenance through predictive insights

• Downtime prevention: 30–50% reduction in unplanned downtime hours

• Energy efficiency: 10–20% reduction in energy consumption through optimization

• Inventory optimization: 15–30% reduction in spare-parts inventory through predictive demand planning

Revenue Enhancement

• Production capacity: 5–15% throughput increase through operational optimization

• Quality improvement: 50–70% reduction in defects and rework

• Product innovation: 30–50% faster time-to-market for new designs

• Service offerings: New predictive maintenance and optimization services for customers

Example ROI Calculation

A mid-size manufacturer with $500M in annual revenue implemented digital twins for production optimization:

• Implementation cost: $2.5M (data foundation, platform and deployment)

• Annual benefits: $6M (downtime reduction $3M, efficiency gains $2M, quality improvement $1M)

• Payback period: 5 months

• Three-year ROI: 620%

Industry Benchmarks

• Manufacturing: Median ROI of 180% over three years

• Energy: 200%+ ROI for asset-intensive operations

• Healthcare: Approximately 150% ROI, driven primarily by reduced prototyping costs

Operational Performance Metrics

Leading Indicators (Health Metrics)

• Model accuracy: Prediction confidence scores and variance between predicted and actual outcomes

• Data quality: Completeness rates, accuracy scores and timeliness SLAs

• System performance: Latency, throughput and uptime percentages

• User engagement: Active users, insight consumption rates and feedback scores

Lagging Indicators (Business Outcomes)

• Asset availability: Improvements in Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)

• Maintenance efficiency: Increases in Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)

• Operational efficiency: Productivity metrics, throughput rates and cycle-time reductions

• Risk reduction: Lower incident rates, improved safety performance and higher compliance scores

Best practice

Leverage a balanced scorecard to track both technical performance (model accuracy, data quality) and business outcomes (cost savings, efficiency gains) to ensure digital twins deliver measurable value.

Continuous Improvement and Value Realization

Quarterly Review Practices

• Value delivery assessment: Validate whether projected benefits are materializing

• Model performance review: Confirm predictions are maintaining accuracy over time

• Use case expansion: Identify additional opportunities for applying digital twins

• Data quality trending: Monitor improvements in integration reliability and quality metrics

Common Value Realization Pitfalls

• Focusing on technical metrics without linking them to business outcomes

• Underestimating change management and user adoption requirements

• Failing to operationalize insights within decision-making workflows

• Lacking executive visibility into ongoing value delivery

Best Practice

Establish a Digital Twin Center of Excellence with cross-functional representation from IT, operations, data management and business units to govern investments, share best practices and ensure sustained value realization.

Building Your Digital Twin Strategy

Digital twins represent a transformative opportunity for enterprises to optimize operations, accelerate innovation and strengthen competitive advantage. The technology has moved well beyond the early-adopter phase, with proven results across manufacturing, energy, healthcare and infrastructure. Organizations that deploy digital twins effectively are using them not as isolated models, but as data-driven systems embedded into everyday decision-making.

Critical Success Factors

Sustained success depends less on digital twin software and more on the underlying data foundation that supports it and enterprises who realize this consistently achieve three to five times higher ROI than organizations focused solely on visualization or simulation capabilities. Invest in:

• Master data management to maintain unified, authoritative asset and product information

• Data integration platforms capable of connecting IT and OT systems at enterprise scale

• Data quality frameworks that ensure accuracy, consistency and timeliness

• Governance processes that manage security, compliance and end-to-end data lineage

Strategic Recommendations

• Start with business outcomes: Define clear, measurable use cases before selecting technology

• Assess data readiness: Evaluate current data quality, integration capabilities and governance maturity

• Pilot strategically: Focus on high-value use cases with a manageable initial scope

• Build systematically: Establish a strong data foundation before scaling across the enterprise

• Measure continuously: Track both technical performance and business outcomes to sustain value

Next Steps

For organizations ready to pursue digital twin initiatives, the logical next step is assessing data foundation readiness. The companion guide, Why Digital Twins Fail Without the Right Data Foundation, provides detailed implementation frameworks and data architecture patterns to support this journey.
Accelerate your journey and elevate your outcomes with Informatica’s Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC). Click here to discover how IDMC delivers the enterprise-grade data integration, data quality and governance capabilities required for digital twin success.